Prioritizing variables for evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of brief interventions for reducing alcohol consumption: a Latin American perspective

Simple item page
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Social Sciences in Health, Direction of Epidemiological and Psychosocial Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico
dc.contributor.emailtibsam@imp.edu.mx ; mtiburcio3@gmail.com (Marcela Tiburcio)
dc.creatorTiburcio, Marcelaes_ES
dc.creatorMonteiro, Maristela G.es_ES
dc.creatorShorter, Gillian W.es_ES
dc.creatorMartinez-Velez, Noraes_ES
dc.creatorRonzani, Telmoes_ES
dc.creatorMaiga, Lalla A.es_ES
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-01T18:23:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-27T15:30:29Z
dc.date.available2024-11-01T18:23:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.published2022
dc.descriptionObjective: The purpose of this study was to identify priority variables to evaluate alcohol brief interventions from the perspective of experts in the field in Latin America. Method: A two-round Delphi procedure was carried out through online surveys of 465 individuals from 18 Latin American countries, including core outcome set developers, researchers, health professionals, users of healthcare services, journal editors, members of nongovernmental organizations, and policymakers. The questionnaire, in Spanish and Portuguese, rated 101 variables according to their relevance to the efficacy and effectiveness of brief interventions. Results: Round 1 yielded 47 variables that met the consensus criterion of at least 70% of participants; Round 2 yielded 63 variables. To reduce the possible effect of varying levels of expertise, data were analyzed by subgroup, with consensus defined as 70% of each subgroup rating a variable as critical. Seventeen outcome variables met this criterion, 14 from the initial set and 3 suggested by the participants in Round 1. Conclusions: Only four outcomes coincide with the findings of a similar international Delphi study that underrepresented Latin American countries. The findings point to the importance of including a wider variety of professionals and cultural backgrounds in international consensus panels to minimize the risk of predominance of a single perspective.es_ES
dc.identifierJC45DIEP22es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.15288/jsad.2022.83.153
dc.identifier.eissn1938-4114
dc.identifier.issn1937-1888
dc.identifier.organizacionInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
dc.identifier.placeEstados Unidos
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2022.83.153
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.inprf.gob.mx/handle/123456789/8093
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAlcohol Research Documentation, Inc., Rutgers, The State University of New Jerseyes_ES
dc.relation83(1):153-158
dc.relation.jnabreviadoJ STUD ALCOHOL DRUGS
dc.relation.journalJournal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
dc.rightsAcceso Cerradoes_ES
dc.titlePrioritizing variables for evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of brief interventions for reducing alcohol consumption: a Latin American perspectivees_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Artículos de revista