Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

The analytical framework of governance in health policies in the face of health emergencies: a systematic review

dc.creatorDíaz-Castro, Linaes_ES
dc.creatorRamírez-Rojas, María Guadalupees_ES
dc.creatorCabello-Rangel, Héctores_ES
dc.creatorSánchez-Osorio, Everes_ES
dc.creatorVelázquez-Posada, Mauricioes_ES
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-24T17:17:46Z
dc.date.available2024-09-24T17:17:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierJC16DIEP22es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.inprf.gob.mx/handle/123456789/8050
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.628791
dc.descriptionThe Governance Analytical Framework (MAG) defines governance as a social fact, endowed with analyzable and interpretable characteristics, through what it calls observable constitutive elements of governance: the problem, the actors, the social norms, the process of decision-making and scope or nodal points; in the sense that each society develops its modes of governance, its decision-making or conflict resolution systems among its members, its norms, and institutions. In this perspective, the purpose of this article was to carry out a systematic review of the scientific literature to understand the role of governance in health policies in health emergencies, such as that caused by the SARS-CoV-2. The systematic review was designed based on the methodology proposed in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) Declaration. The literature search was carried out in six databases: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, APA-PsycInfo, MEDLINE, eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), PubMED, and MedicLatina, published in the last 5 years. Fifteen articles that met quality and evidence criteria were analyzed. The governance approach alluding to the health emergency problem in health policies was the most addressed by the authors (80%), followed by a description of the actors (40%), the process of decision-making spaces (33%), and ultimately, social norms or rules with 13%. Formulating a coherent set of global health policies within a large-scale global governance framework is mostly absent. Although the countries adopt international approaches, it is a process differentiated by the social, economic, and political contexts between countries, affecting heterogeneous health outcomes over the pandemic.es_ES
dc.formatPDFes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Editorial Officees_ES
dc.relation10:628791
dc.rightsAcceso Cerradoes_ES
dc.titleThe analytical framework of governance in health policies in the face of health emergencies: a systematic reviewes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationDirection of Epidemiological and Psychosocial Research, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), Mexico City, Mexico
dc.contributor.emailamairanai@gmail.com (María Guadalupe Ramírez-Rojas)
dc.relation.jnabreviadoFRONT PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Public Health
dc.identifier.placeSuiza
dc.date.published2022
dc.identifier.organizacionInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
dc.identifier.eissn2296-2565
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpubh.2022.628791
dc.subject.kwGovernance
dc.subject.kwHealth policy
dc.subject.kwPandemic (COVID-19)
dc.subject.kwPublic policy
dc.subject.kwGovernment


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem