Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorRumpf, Hans-Jürgenes_ES
dc.creatorBrandt, Dominiquees_ES
dc.creatorDemetrovics, Zsoltes_ES
dc.creatorBillieux, Joëles_ES
dc.creatorCarragher, Natachaes_ES
dc.creatorBrand, Matthiases_ES
dc.creatorBowden-Jones, Henriettaes_ES
dc.creatorRahimi-Movaghar, Afarines_ES
dc.creatorAssanangkornchai, Sawitries_ES
dc.creatorGlavak-Tkalic, Renataes_ES
dc.creatorBorges, Guilhermees_ES
dc.creatorLee, Hae-Kookes_ES
dc.creatorRehbein, Florianes_ES
dc.creatorFineberg, Naomi A.es_ES
dc.creatorMann, Karles_ES
dc.creatorPotenza, Marc N.es_ES
dc.creatorStein, Dan J.es_ES
dc.creatorHiguchi, Susumues_ES
dc.creatorKing, Danieles_ES
dc.creatorSaunders, John B.es_ES
dc.creatorPoznyak, Vladimires_ES
dc.date2019
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T18:40:25Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T18:40:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierJC065es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.inprf.gob.mx/handle/123456789/7610
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00262-2
dc.descriptionAbstract Purpose of Review The 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) categorizes gambling disorder in the section on substance-related and addictive disorders, and the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) includes both gambling and gaming disorder as disorders due to addictive behaviors. However, there is less evidence for other putative behavioral addictions. This review focuses on requirements for epidemiological studies of disorders that may be considered as behavioral addictions and compares the current state of research with principles of sound epidemio logical research. Recent Findings In studies of behavioral addictions, samples are often quite small, which may lead to increased random error. The lack of sound assessment tools—particularly the lack of agreed-upon diagnostic criteria and standardized diagnostic interviews—may also increase systematic error. Other concerns related to systematic bias include the use of convenience samples, lack of pro-active recruitment, inadequate assessment of confounding variables, and a dearth of representative and longitudinal studies. Summary This review recommends that future studies of putative behavioral addictions should more closely adhere to method ological standards of epidemiological research to reduce random and systematic error. Specific recommendations are detailed to advance epidemiological research in this area with the aim of improving the evidence base and generating more refined public health recommendations and policies.es_ES
dc.formatPDFes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing AGes_ES
dc.relation6, 331–337
dc.rightsAcceso Cerradoes_ES
dc.titleEpidemiological challenges in the study of behavioral addictions: a call for high standard methodologieses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Integrative Psychiatry, Research Group S:TEP, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
dc.contributor.emailhans-juergen.rumpf@uksh.de(Hans-Jürgen Rumpf)
dc.relation.jnabreviadoCURR ADDICT REP
dc.relation.journalCurrent Addiction Reports
dc.identifier.placeSuiza
dc.date.published2019
dc.identifier.organizacionInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
dc.identifier.eissn2196-2952
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40429-019-00262-2
dc.subject.kwBehavioral addiction
dc.subject.kwEpidemiology
dc.subject.kwSurveys
dc.subject.kwAssessment
dc.subject.kwRecommendation
dc.subject.kwRandom error
dc.subject.kwSystematic error


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem